PDA

View Full Version : Vanek/Bergeron/Neal for Marleau/Giroux/Stewart



volcomdevil
02-16-2011, 12:59 PM
Another owner and I have been going back and forth for like a week trying to get a deal done. I've been staring at our teams so much that I can't tell if this deal would be worth it or if it would be pointless and making a deal just to make a deal.

He lost Malkin and wants a center, Bergeron. I want Giroux from him but he doesn't want to do 1 for 1. He said he also would want Vanek and talked about Stewart/Giroux for Vanek/Bergeron which I don't want any part of. Would adding Neal and Marleau be a good move? I think I can take the hit of taking on Stewart to see if he can do anything again but who knows. Just thought I'd get some thoughts from some other people.

Here's his team:
Patrick Marleau (SJ - C,W)
Travis Zajac (NJ - C)
Ryan Smyth (LA - W)
Chris Stewart (Col - W)
Claude Giroux (Phi - W)
Michael Frolik (Chi - W)
Paul Stastny (Col - C)
Jarret Stoll (LA - C)
Duncan Keith (Chi - D)
Andrej Meszaros (Phi - D)
P.K. Subban (Mon - D)
Evander Kane (Atl - W)
Shane Doan (Pho - W)
Mikael Samuelsson (Van - W) Pla
IR Ryan Malone (TB - W)

Marc-Andre Fleury (Pit - G)
Jonathan Quick (LA - G)
Ondrej Pavelec (Atl - G)

gogoayane
02-16-2011, 01:21 PM
I am not sure if he'll move Marleau given he lost Malkin and he is looking for a C. I would take the current deal if he offers it, but I don't see how this helps his team.

volcomdevil
02-16-2011, 05:34 PM
Well he said he would do Vanek/Bergeron/Neal for Marleau/Giroux/Stewart so I'm just gonna go for it and hope Stewart comes around.

jeffoule
02-16-2011, 11:33 PM
rip off

Gambit
02-17-2011, 11:06 AM
I'd rather have the Marleau/Giroux/Stewart side.

toronto1979
02-17-2011, 01:42 PM
Well he said he would do Vanek/Bergeron/Neal for Marleau/Giroux/Stewart so I'm just gonna go for it and hope Stewart comes around.
Take it. Marleau's +-/- can only go up. Giroux is a stud and Stewart is a great buy low opportunity.